Kevin Garnett was everything you’d expect from a winning basketball
player.
He was a defensive demon and reliable scorer who played with
endless energy – and constant trash talk. Yet until Danny Ainge put together a Big
Three in Boston, Garnett appeared to be headed toward a career similar to Tracy
McGrady, a statistical marvel with no playoff accomplishments.
From 1995-1996 – when the Minnesota Timberwolves drafted him
straight out of high school – through the 2006-2007 season, Garnett had made
the playoffs in eight out of 12 seasons and gotten out of the first round just
once. And instead of building on that little bit of success in 2003-2004,
Minnesota missed the postseason the next three years even though KG was 28, 29
and 30. Can you imagine another player of Garnett’s talent not being able to
will his team into the playoffs three years in a row?
Then Ainge rescued Garnett from oblivion and matched him with Paul Pierce and Ray Allen. After going 17-31 in the playoffs his first seven trips, Garnett went 53-43 in his final six, winning one NBA championship and making it to the finals in another season. It’s that late career surge that helped Garnett nail down a spot in the Top 20.
Then Ainge rescued Garnett from oblivion and matched him with Paul Pierce and Ray Allen. After going 17-31 in the playoffs his first seven trips, Garnett went 53-43 in his final six, winning one NBA championship and making it to the finals in another season. It’s that late career surge that helped Garnett nail down a spot in the Top 20.
It’s not as if he isn’t deserving. Garnett played in 15
all-star games, made the playoffs 14 times, led the league in rebounding four
times and was named to 12 all-defensive teams. His advanced stats were even
better. He led the league in PER twice, Win Shares twice, Box +/- twice and
VORP three times. That 2003-2004 season – the one where the T-Wolves did some
actual damage in the playoffs – was one for the ages. Garnett swept the major
advanced stats, leading the NBA in PER, win shares, Box +/- and VORP in the
regular season. He was the overwhelming NBA MVP winner. His playoff numbers
weren’t as good, but he still had a 25.0 PER and 6.2 Box +/- in 18 playoff
games.
That all added up to a 422.92 for the year, making him one
of just 18 players to accomplish a 400+ season in my system.
Garnett was going to be in the Top 50 of my system with or
without the years in Boston contending for titles against LeBron James and Kobe
Bryant. But ask yourself this, without the Boston years, would Garnett be
considered a winner?
Kevin Garnett
bio info
|
|
Career
|
1995-2016
|
Games
|
1,462
|
Points
|
17.8
|
Rebounds
|
10.0
|
Assists
|
3.7
|
FG Pct.
|
49.7%
|
All-Star games
|
15
|
NBA MVPs
|
1
|
NBA titles
|
1
|
Playoff seasons
|
14
|
Playoff games
|
143
|
Points
|
18.2
|
Rebounds
|
10.7
|
Assists
|
3.3
|
FG Pct.
|
47.8%
|
Hall of Fame
|
|
Top 100
rankings
|
||
|
Points
|
Top 100 ranking
|
1-year
|
422.92
|
14th
|
5-year
|
1,652.19
|
23rd
|
10-year
|
2,861.99
|
28th
|
Career
|
4,361.39
|
14th
|
Kevin
Garnett at his peak
|
|||
2003-2004
|
Garnett
|
Top 5
|
Points
|
PER
|
29.4
|
25.97
|
|
Win Shares
|
18.3
|
13.71
|
|
Box +/-
|
9.9
|
7.40
|
|
VORP
|
9.8
|
6.79
|
|
Total Advanced Stats
|
67.4
|
53.87
|
125.12
|
Playoff PER
|
25.0
|
24.72
|
|
Win Shares
|
2.7
|
3.50
|
|
Box +/-
|
6.2
|
6.59
|
|
VORP
|
1.6
|
1.72
|
|
Total Advanced Stats
|
35.5
|
36.53
|
97.19
|
Reg. Season Win %
|
70.73
|
70.73
|
|
Playoff Win %
|
55.56
|
55.56
|
|
MVP Voting (75 points)
|
1,219/1,230
|
74.33
|
|
Playoff MVP (25 points)
|
0
|
0
|
|
Total Score
|
|
|
422.92
|
Garnett’s 10 greatest seasons
|
|
2003-2004
|
422.92
|
2007-2008
|
358.18
|
2002-2003
|
329.58
|
2000-2001
|
273.07
|
1999-2000
|
268.44
|
2011-2012
|
248.33
|
2010-2011
|
247.79
|
2009-2010
|
240.42
|
1998-1999
|
236.94
|
2001-2002
|
236.32
|
Career
winning percentage
|
|||
|
W
|
L
|
Pct.
|
Regular Season
|
825
|
637
|
56.43%
|
Playoffs
|
70
|
74
|
48.61%
|
Kevin Garnett was the best No. 2 in NBA history. ... He was everything you would ever want EXCEPT an Alpha scorer. He didn't really have a low-post game. And he didn't have John Stockton to get him the ball. But he was such a leader, great defender, good passer, excellent rebounder and didn't demand the ball on offense. ... Just don't depend on him to make game-winning shots.
ReplyDelete